Cancer comes from a straightforward fungal infection and It could be cured
My concept is the fact that cancer doesn't rely on mysterious causes (genetic, immunological or auto immunological as the official oncology proposes, but it comes down from a straightforward fungal infection, whose destroying energy in the deep tissues is really under estimated.
Premise
The present operate is based on the conviction, supported by a lot of years of observations, comparisons and experiences, that the needed and enough cause of the tumour is usually to be sought within the vast planet on the fungi, probably the most adaptable, aggressive and evolved micro-organisms known in nature.
I have tried lots of occasions to explain this theory to major institutions involved in cancer challenges (the Ministry of Wellness, the Italian Medical Oncological Association, and so forth.) elaborating on my thinking, but I've been brushed aside because of the impossibility of setting my thought inside a traditional context.
A distinctive, international audience represents the possibility of sharing a view about well being, which differs, from what is widely accepted by today's medical community, either officially or from the sidelines.
There is an opposition amongst the allopathic plus the Hippocratic medical best. The former has the disadvantage of its inability to consider the individual as a whole. Thus it brings with it all of the distortions and aberrations which such a point of view entails (excessive specialisation, therapeutic aggressiveness, superficiality, harmfulness etc.). The latter approach rather tends within the direction of getting as well generic, non-scientific, and devoid of therapeutic incisiveness.
The position that I promote represents rather a meeting point of those two conceptions of well being, given that, from the conceptual point of view, it sublimates and adds worth to each, even though highlighting how they both are victims of a typical conformist language.
The hypothesis of a fungal aetiology in chronic-degenerative illness, able to connect the ethical qualities of your individual using the development of precise pathologies, reconciles the two orientations (allopathic and holistic) of medicine. The hypothesis is usually a robust candidate for becoming that missing element of psychosomatics that has been sought but in no way identified by among the fathers of psychosomatics, Wiktor Von Weiszäcker.
In thinking of the biological dimensions with the fungi, for example, it's achievable to compare the distinctive degrees of pathogenicity in relation towards the situation of organs, tissues and cells of a guest organism, which in turn also and primarily rely on the behaviour with the individual.
Each time the recuperative skills of a recognized psycho-physic structure are exceeded, there is certainly an inevitable exposure, even thinking about doable accidental cofounders, for the aggression -- even at the smallest dimensions -- of those external agents that otherwise could be harmless.
In the presence of an indubitable connection among patient morale and illness it is actually no longer legitimate to separate the two domains (allopathic and naturopathic) that are both indispensable for enhancing the health of men and women.
The Platonic separation in the human mind from the human body, accountable for the present mechanistic and materialistic character of today's medicine, is outdated. So could be the pessimistic Kantian position concerning integration of the rational and emotional sides of man ("the starred sky above me, the moral law inside me"), which generates the present myopia of today's medical epistemology. With such outdated cognitive frameworks inevitably come each of the mindsets that carry comparable restrictive and limiting presuppositions.
Candida Albicans: Needed and Adequate Cause of Cancer
When facing the most pressing modern medical issue, cancer, the first issue to do is to admit that we still do not know its genuine trigger. Nonetheless treated in various approaches by both official and alternative medicine, an aural of mystery nevertheless exists around its actual generative procedure.
The attempt to overcome the present impasse need to for that reason and necessarily go through two separate phases: a critical one particular that exposes the present limitations of oncology, in addition to a constructive a single capable of proposing a therapeutic program determined by a brand new theoretical point of departure.
In agreement with all the most recent formulation of scientific philosophy, which suggests a counter-inductive approach exactly where it is impossible to discover a resolution using the conceptual tools which are frequently accepted, only one logical formulation emerges; that is definitely, to refuse the oncological principle which assumes cancer is generated by acellular reproductive anomaly.
However, when the basic hypothesis of cellular reproductive anomaly is questioned, it becomes clear that each of the theories determined by this hypothesis are inevitably flawed.
It follows that both an auto-immunological method, in which the body's defence mechanisms against external agents turn their destructive capacity against internal constituents with the body, and an anomaly in the genetic structure implicated in the improvement of auto-destruction, are inevitably disqualified.
Moreover, the prevalent try to construct theories about a number of causes which have an oncogenic effect on cellular reproduction sometimes appears like a concealing screen, behind which there's nothing at all but a wall. These theories propose endless causes that are more or less associated with each other; and this signifies in reality that no valid causes are identified. The invocation in turn of smoking, alcohol, toxic substances, diet regime, stress, psychological aspects, and so on., with no a adequately defined context, causes confusion and resignation, and creates even more mystification around a illness which could turn out to become easier than it truly is depicted to become.
As background details, it's important to overview the picture of presumed genetic influences within the improvement of cancer processes as they're depicted by molecular biologists. They are the scientists who execute study on infinitesimally small cellular mechanisms, but who in true life never see a patient. All present medical systems are determined by this research, and as a result, regrettably, all therapies currently performed.
The key hypothesis of a genetic neoplastic causality is basically reduced for the truth that the structures and the mechanism in charge of normal reproductive cellular activity turn out to be, for undefined causes, capable of an autonomous behaviour that is definitely disjointed from the general tissular economy.
The genes that usually have a constructive role in cellular reproduction are, then, imprecisely known as proto-oncogenes; these which inhibit cellular reproduction are referred to as suppressor genes or recessive oncogenes.
Both endogenous (under no circumstances demonstrated) and exogenous cellular variables -- which is, those carcinogenic elements which are usually invoked -- are held accountable for the neoplastic degeneration on the tissues.
In J.H. Stein (Medicina Interna - Internal Medicine, Mosby Year Book inc.1994, St. Louis, Missouri, 4th edition, Milano, 1995, page 1186 -1187) the following is reported:
The mitogenic signals, from the microenvironment or from far more distant places of influence, are transmitted towards the cells by many receptive structures which might be connected for the plasmatic membrane.
Among these structures, the ones which have been studied most exhaustively are receptors with an external domain for the binder, a transmembranic domain as well as a cytoplasmatic domain using a thyrosinkinase activity.
Besides these, it truly is thought that no less than seven distinct classes of molecules take part in the transmission from the mutagenic signal:
1) receptors coupled to G proteins
2) ionic channels
3) receptors with intrinsic activity guanil cyclase
4) receptors for quite a few lymphofokines, cytokines and development components (interleukine, eritropoietine, etc.)
5) receptors for the phosphothyrosine phosphorilase activity
6) nuclear receptors belonging for the supergenic loved ones with the receptor for steroidal estrogenic and thyroidal hormones
7) Lastly, escalating numbers of tests recommend that the adhesion molecules expressed on the surface in the cells communicate with all the microenvironment in approaches that develop essential consequences for cellular development and differentiation.
From an extremely superficial analysis of this presumed oncological image, however, it seems to become clear how the assertion of all this unstoppable genetic hyperactivity, generated by components that pretty much appear to lurk in the realms on the sinister and also the monstrous, and that hence suggest the existence of God-knows-what abysmal mechanisms which will only be deciphered with equally abysmal conceptual mechanisms -- all this could do nothing at all additional that unveil the abysmal stupidity that is certainly at the basis of this method of conceiving issues.
What is much more critical may be the reality that nobody in the present health establishment appears to question the above-mentioned stupidities. All people that function inside the field do absolutely nothing but repeat the stale litany of reproductive cellular anomalies on a genetic basis.
Since within this state of affairs the present medical theory shows an impoverishment plus a superficiality which can be indeed abysmal, it truly is much better to appear for new horizons and conceptual instruments that are capable of unearthing a actual and special neoplastic aetiology.
After a great number of years of failure and suffering it really is time to rejuvenate minds with new and productive juices. Arguments for mysterious and complex genetic factors, a monstrous reproductive capacity by a pathologic entity capable of tearing apart any tissue, the idea that there is certainly an implicit and ancestral tendency of your human organism to deviate in an auto-destructive sense -- these and other comparable arguments, spiced with exponentially multiplying numbers of "ifs" and "maybes" -- it all has the flavour a lot more of raving free-association than of a healthful scientific discourse.
Once the present oncological perspectives have been refuted, nevertheless, it is legitimate to ask how the successes achieved by official medicine and by option medicine must be classified.
To this end, it truly is beneficial to bear in mind that modern epistemology has demonstrated how the contributions to causality of contextual and co-textual components of a theory, if they can't be defined, are consequently chancy, specially in ultra-dimensional space, that is, in the microscopic dimension.
In practical terms, this indicates that data or constructive facts which might be thought of proof when regarding a standard principle (as an example, the above-mentioned cellular reproductive anomalies), and for that reason obtained by utilising a restricted number of variables next for the complexity of human disease, can't be trusted, considering the fact that they operate only from the initial hypothetical functions.
Where, in actual fact, we admit the possibility of improvements or cures, it is not admissible from the logical point of view attribute them to this or that approach of remedy that is definitely additional of less official, considering that it's not possible to specify and consist of all or the majority from the elements that happen to be at play in the object man, in whom conditions of certainty cannot exist.
Paradoxically, the achievable good impact of each and every therapeutic program could derive from elements which might be not foreseen and are unknown to all. Those elements, having said that, could be influenced by or determined to some extent by 1 a different.
We may possibly come across ourselves in a position in which everybody rightfully has the appropriate to promote his point of view, without having recognizing the true motives for his successes.
In this case, then, even essentially the most rigorous experimentation requires on a fictional character as opposed to the function of a true correspondence with reality, along with the finish result is really a continuous sterile petitio principii.
If we then put aside absolutely the conceptual frame of contemporary oncology with all its interpretative variables of genetic, immuncological and toxicological character, what exactly is left because the only logical, practicable way will be the domain in the infectious diseases, to become noticed and reconsidered with various eyes which has been the situation so far.
Two considerations support such a conclusion. One is of a historical nature, and the other is of an epidemiological nature. The former derives from the reality that, within the therapeutical method towards the patient, the improvement in superior, that's the possibility of a true cure for the patient, has been determined practically exclusively by the development of microbiology. The latter derives from the evaluation of life expectancy which has taken spot within the last decades which, due to the fact it's connected with an inevitable transform from the sthenicity of people, is often hypothesised as a figuring out factor in the development atypical infectious pathologies.
In order to find the probable carcinogenic ens morbi on the horizon of microbiology, it appears handy to return towards the simple taxonomical ideas of biology, where we can see, incidentally, the existence of a noticeable amount of indecision and indetermination.
Already within the last century, a German biologist, Ernest Haeckele (1834-1919), departing from the Linnaeian notion that makes for two great kingdoms of living items (vegetable and animal) denounced the issues of categorising all these microscopic organisms which, due to their characteristics and properties, couldn't be attributed to either the vegetable or animal kingdom. For these organisms, he proposed a third kingdom, known as Protists.
"This vast and complicated planet involves a range of entities starting with these which have sub-cellular structure -- present at the limits of life -- which include viroids and viruses, moving through the mycoplasms, to ultimately, organisms of greater organisation: bacteria, actinomycetes, mixomycetes, fungi, protozoa, and probably even some microscopic algae." (two).
The frequent element of these organisms would be the feeding technique, which, becoming implemented (with incredibly handful of exceptions) by direct absorption of soluble organic compounds, differentiates them both from animals and vegetables. Animals also feed as above, but primarily by ingesting solid organic materials which are then transformed via the digestive method. Vegetables are capable, by utilising mineral compounds and light power, to feed by synthesising the organic substances.
The contemporary tendency of biologists is usually to once again pick up, although inside a much more sophisticated way, the notion of the third kingdom. One particular goes even additional, nevertheless, arguing that inside that kingdom, fungi need to be classified in a distinct category.
O. Verona (three) says that if we place multicellular organisms provided with photosynthetic capabilities (plants) in the first kingdom, and also the organisms not supplied with photosynthetic pigmentation (animals) inside the second kingdom, and organisms from each these kingdoms are created of cells provided with a distinct nucleus (eukaryotes); and Obd2 scanner, furthermore, if we put in another kingdom (protists) those monocellular organisms which have no chlorophyll and have cells that are with out a distinct nucleus (prokaryotes), the fungi can nicely have their own kingdom because of the absence of photosynthetic pigmentation, the capacity to be mono-cellular, and multi-cellular, and, ultimately, their possession of a distinct nucleus.
Additionally, fungi possess a property which is strange when when compared with all other micro-organisms: the ability to possess a simple microscopic structure (hypha) using a simultaneous tendency to grow to outstanding dimensions (up to a number of kilograms), keeping unchanged the capacity to adapt and reproduce at any size.
From this point of view, hence, fungi can't be thought to be true organisms, but cellular aggregates sui generiswith an organismic behaviour, due to the fact every cell maintains its survival and reproductive prospective intact irrespective of the structure in which it exists.
It is consequently clear how tricky it is actually to identify each of the biological processes in such complicated living realities. In reality, even at this time, you can find large voids and taxonomical approximations in mycology.
It is worthwhile to examine more deeply this strange planet, with such peculiar characteristics, and try to highlight these components that somehow may well be pertinent towards the difficulties of oncology.
1) Fungi are heterotrophic organisms and hence require, as far as nitrogen and carbon are concerned, pre-formed compounds. Of these compounds, very simple carbohydrates, by way of example monosaccarides (glucose, fructose, and mannose) are among the most utilised sugars. This implies that fungi, for the duration of their life cycle, rely on other living beings, which should be exploited in unique degrees for their feeding. This happens each within a saprophytic way (that may be, by feeding on organic waste) and in a parasitic way (that is, by attacking the tissue from the host directly).
2) Fungi show an awesome number of reproductive manifestations (sexual, asexual, gemmation; these manifestations can usually be observed simultaneously inside the exact same mycete), combined with a excellent morphostructural number of organs. All of this can be directed toward the finish of spore formation, to which the continuity and propagation from the species is entrusted.
3) In mycology, it truly is generally probable to observe a particular phenomenon called heterocarion, characterised by the coexistence of normal and mutant nuclei in cells which have undergone a hyphal fusion.
Nowadays, phitopathologists are pretty worried regarding the creation of folks which can be genetically very unique even from the parents. This difference has taken location by suggests of those reproductive cycles, that are referred to as parasexual.
The indiscriminate use of phitopharmaceuticals has in truth frequently determined mutations in the nuclei of several parasite fungi using the consequent creation of heterocarion -- and this is sometimes especially virulent in its pathogenicity (4).
4) Within the parasitic dimension, fungi can develop from the hyphas far more or less beak-shaped specialised structures that enable the penetration of your host.
5) The production of spores might be so abundant as to generally include things like, at each and every cycle, tens, hundreds, as well as a huge number of millions of components that will be dispersed at a outstanding distance from the point of origin (a smaller movement is adequate, for example, to implement quick diffusion).
6) Spores have an immense resistance to external aggression, for they are capable of staying dormant in adverse situations for many years, although preserving unaltered their regenerative potentialities.
7) The improvement coefficient with the hyphal apexes right after the germination is very quick (100 microns per minute beneath ideal conditions) with ramification capacity, hence using the appearance of a brand new apex area that in some instances is in the neighbourhood of 40-60 seconds (6).
8) The shape in the fungus is under no circumstances defined, for it is actually imposed by the environment in which the fungus develops.
It is attainable to observe, as an example, exactly the same mycelium in the basic isolated hyphas status within a liquid environment or in the type of aggregates that happen to be increasingly solid and compact as much as the formation of pseudoparenchymas and of filaments and mycelial strings (7).
9) By the identical token, it is actually feasible to observe in distinctive fungi the identical shape anytime they have to adapt towards the identical environment (this is named dimorphism).
The partial or total substitution of nourishing substances induces frequent mutations in fungi, and this really is additional proof of their high adaptability to any sub-strata.
10) When the nutritional circumstances are precarious, quite a few fungi react with hyphal fusion (amongst nearby fungi) which makes it possible for them to discover the out there material a lot more easily, utilizing far more total physiological processes.
This house, which substitutes co-operation for competitors, makes them distinct from any other microorganism, and because of this Buller calls them social organisms (eight).
11) When a cell gets old or becomes damaged (i.e. by a toxic substance or by a pharmaceutical) numerous fungi whose intercellular septums are supplied having a pore react by implementing of a defence method calledprotoplasmic flux through which they transfer the nucleus and cytoplasm of your damaged cell into a healthy one particular, hence conserving unaltered all their biological prospective.
12) The phenomena regulating the improvement of hyphal ramification are unknown to date (9). They consist either of a rhythmic improvement, or within the look of sectors which, although they originate from the hyphal system, are self-regulating (ten), which is, independent of the regulating action and behaviour of the rest with the colony.
13) Fungi are capable of implementing an infinite quantity of modifications to their very own metabolism to be able to overcome the defence mechanism from the host. These modifications are implemented through plasmatic and biochemical actions also as by a volumetric raise (hypertrophy) and numerical hyperplasy with the cells which have been attacked (11).
14) Fungi are so aggressive as to attack not merely plants, animal tissue, food supplies and other fungi, but even protozoa, amoebas and nematodes.
Fungi hunt nematodes, by way of example, with peculiar hyphal modifications that constitute genuine mycelial criss-cross, viscose, or ring traps that accomplish the immobilisation of the worms, as a precursor their hyphal invasion.
In some cases, the aggressive energy of fungi is so good as to allow it, with only a cellular ring made up of three units, to tighten in its grip, capture and kill its prey in a brief time notwithstanding the prey's desperate struggling.
From the brief notations above, thus, it seems fair to dedicate a greater consideration to the planet of fungi, specifically considering the truth that biologists and microbiologists constantly highlight big deficiencies and voids in all their descriptions and interpretations with the fungi's shape, physiology and reproduction.
So the fungus, which can be by far the most effective as well as the most organised micro-organism identified, seems to become an incredibly logical candidate as a cause of neoplastic proliferation. Imperfect Fungi (so named due to the lack of knowledge and understanding of their biological processes) deserve unique attention considering the fact that their essential prerogative sits in their fermentative capacity.
The greatest illness of mankind may perhaps consequently hide inside the small cluster of pathogenic fungi, and may possibly be just after all be located with just some simple deductions able to close the circle and supplying the solution.
Considering that, among the human parasite species, the Dermatophytes and Sporotrichum demonstrate an excessively certain morbidity, and that expertise shows that Actinomycetes, Toluropsis and Hystoplasma hardly ever enter the context of pathology, the Candid Albicans clearly emerges as the sole candidate for tumoral proliferation.
If we cease to get a second and reflect on its characteristics, we are able to observe lots of analogies with neoplastic illness. One of the most evident are:
1) Ubiquitous attachment: no organ or tissue is spared
2) The constant absence of hyperpyrexia
3) Sporadic and indirect involvement with the differential tissues
4) Invasiveness that is virtually exclusively from the focal type
5) Progressive debilitation
6) Refractivity to any type of treatment
7) Proliferation facilitated by multiplicity of indifferent cofounders
8) Symptomatological simple configuration with structure tending to the chronic
Therefore an exceptionally high and diversified pathogenic potentiality exists in this mycete of just a number of microns in size, which, although it cannot be traced using the present experimental instruments, can not be neglected from the clinical point of view.
Certainly, its present nosological classification can't be satisfactory, mainly because if we tend not to preserve the possibly endless parasitic configurations in thoughts, that classification is too simplistic and constraining.
We thus must hypothesise that Candida, within the moment it is attacked by the immunological program on the host or by a traditional antimycotic treatment, does not react inside the usual, predicted way, but defends itself by transforming itself into ever-smaller and non-differentiated components that preserve their fecundity intact to the point of hiding their presence both towards the host organism and to achievable diagnostic investigations.
The Candida's behaviour could be deemed to be just about elastic:
When favourable situations exist, it thrives on an epithelium; as soon because the tissue reaction is engaged, it massively transforms itself into a type that is certainly less productive but impervious to attack -- the spore.
If then continuous sub-epithelial solutions take location coupled with a greater a-reactivity in that incredibly moment the spore gets deeper in the lower connective tissue in such an impervious state, it can be irreversible.
In truth, the Candida takes advantage of a structural interchangeability utilising, according to the difficulties to overcome its biological niche.
In this way, Candida is free of charge to expand to maturation in the soil, air, water, vegetation, and so forth., that is certainly, wherever there's no antibody reaction.
In the epithelium, as an alternative, it takes a mixed kind, that's decreased for the sole spore element when it penetrates within the lower epithelial levels, where it tends to expand yet again in the presence of conditions tissular a-reactivity.
The initial mandatory step of an in-depth research endeavour would be to understand if and in which dimensions the spore transcends; what mechanisms it engages to hide itself or, again, if it preserves its parasitical characteristic, or if it has available a neutral quiescent position, that is complicated and even impossible to detect by the immunological technique.
Unfortunately at this time we do not have the proper signifies, either theoretical or technical, to answer these and related queries, to ensure that the only valid suggestions can come solely from clinical observation and practical experience. When not supplying quick solutions, these sources can at stimulate further questions.
Assuming that Candida Albicans will be the agent accountable for tumoral development, a targeted therapy would retain into account not just its static and macroscopic manifestations, but even the ultramicroscopic ones primarily in their dynamic valence, which is, the reproductive.
It is really probable that the targets to attack are the fungi's dimensional transition points as a way to perform a decontamination with such a scope as to include things like the complete spectrum with the biological expression: parasitic, vegetative, sporal, and also ultra-dimensional and, towards the limit, viral.
If we quit in the most evident phenomena, we threat administering salves and unguents forever (inside the situation of dermatomycosis or in psoriasis), or to clumsily attack (with surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy) enigmatic tumoral masses with all the sole result of facilitating their propagation, that is already heightened inside the mycelial forms.
Why, a single may perhaps ask, must we assume a diverse and heightened activity of Candida Albicans since it has been abundantly described in its pathological manifestations?
The answer lies inside the reality that it has been studied only within a pathogenic context, that may be, only in relation towards the epithelial tissues. In reality Candida possesses an aggressive valence that's diversified in function from the target tissue. It truly is just in the connective or within the connective atmosphere, in truth, and not within the differentiated tissues, that Candida could obtain circumstances favourable to an unlimited expansion.
This emerges if we quit and reflect for any moment on the main function of connective tissue, that is to convey and supply nourishing substances towards the cells with the whole organism.
This is usually to be regarded as as an environment external towards the much more differentiated cells including nervous, muscular, and so on. It truly is in this context, in fact, that the alimentary competitors requires spot.
On a single hand we've the organism's cellular elements attempting to defeat all types of invasion; however, we've fungal cells trying to absorb ever-growing quantities of nourishing substances, for they have to obey the species' biological crucial to kind ever-larger and diffused masses and colonies.
Candida can only exist as saprophyte Second Non-integer epitheliums (erosions, abrasions, etc.), absence of stage debilitating aspects, unusual transitory conditions (acidosis, metabolic disorder, and microbial disorder). Candida expands superficially (classic mycosis, each exogenous and endogenous). Third Non-integer epitheliums, presence of debilitating components (toxic, stage radiant, traumatic, neuropsychic, etc.).
Candida goes deeper into the sub-epithelial levels from which it may be carried towards the whole organism via the blood and lymph (intimate mycosis). (12) Stages one particular and two are the most studied and known, even though stage 3, although it has been described in its morphological diversity, is decreased to a silent form of saprophytism.
This is just not acceptable from a logical point of view, due to the fact nobody can demonstrate the harmlessness from the fungal cells in the deepest components of the organism. Actually, the assumption that Candida can behave within the similar saprophytic manner that's observed on integer epitheliums when it has successfully penetrated the lower levels is at least risky, since the assumption would need to be sustained by ideas that aretotally aleatory.
In reality, we asked not simply to accept a priori that the connective environment is (a) not suitable to nourish the Candida, but in addition simultaneously to accept (b) the omnipotence of the body's defence program towards an organic structure which is invasive but that then becomes vulnerable when lodged within the deeper tissues.
As to point a), it truly is challenging to picture that a micro-organism so in a position to adapt itself to any sub-strata cannot find components to assistance itself in the human organic substance; by the same token, it seems risky to hypothesise that the human organism's defence method is totally efficient at just about every moment of its existence.
Finally, the assumption that there's a tendency to a state of quiescence and vulnerability within the case of a pathogenic agent including fungus -- one of the most invasive and aggressive microorganism existing in nature -- seems to carry a whiff of irresponsible.
It is hence urgent, on the basis in the above-mentioned considerations, to recognise the hazardous nature of such a pathogenic agent, which can be capable of readily taking essentially the most different biological configurations, both biochemical and structural, in function of your situation from the host organism.
The fungal expansion gradient in actual fact becomes steeper as the tissue that is definitely the host in the mycotic invasion becomes much less eutrophic, and as a result much less reactive.
To that finish, it seems useful to briefly contemplate the "benign tumour" nosological entity. This is a problem that often seems in general pathology but that indeed is brushed aside many of the time too very easily, and it is overlooked, considering that it generally doesn't develop either challenges or worries. It constitutes a single of these underestimated grey areas seldom subjected to rational, fresh consideration.
If the benign tumour, having said that, is just not deemed a full-fledged tumour, it will be advantageous, for clarity, to categorise it in an proper nosological scheme. If, rather, it really is believed that it completely belongs to neoplastic pathology, then it is required to consider its non-invasive character and consequently to think about the causes for this.
It is in truth evident how within this second scenario, the thesis determined by a presumed predisposition from the organism to auto-phagocytosis, obtaining to admit an expressive graduation, would stumble into such extra difficulties including to grow to be exceptionally improbable.
By contrast, inside the fungal situation, the mystery of why you will find benign and malignant tumours is exhaustively solved, because they're able to be recognised as possessing same etiological genesis.
The benignity or malignancy of a cancer in truth is determined by the capability of tissular reaction of a precise organ expressing itself ultimately inside the potential to encyst fungal cells, and to stop them from establishing in ever-larger colonies. This could be achieved additional quickly exactly where the ratio in between differentiated cells and connective tissue is in favour on the former.
Situated involving the impervious noble tissues, then, as well as the defenceless connective, the differentiated connective structures (the glandular structures in distinct) represent that medium term which can be only somewhat vulnerable to attack, due to an capacity to supply a particular kind of defence.
And it is in these situations that benign tumours are formed, that is certainly, exactly where the glandular connective tissue is effective in forming hypertrophic and hyperplastic cellular embankments against the parasites.
In the stomach and in the lung, as an alternative, due to the fact you can find no certain glandular units, the target organ, offered using a small defensive capability, is in the mercy in the invader. Furthermore, it is actually worth mentioning how quite a few types of intimate fungal invasion tend not to identify the look of malignant or benign tumours, but a sort of specific benign tumour (specific degenerative alterations) as is the case of some organs or apparatuses that do not have peculiar glandular structures, but nevertheless are attacked in their connective tissue, but inside a restricted way.
If we consider, in reality, many sclerosis, SLA, psoriasis, nodular panartherite, and so forth. the feasible improvement from the fungus within a three-dimensional sense is in fact limited by the anatomic configuration from the invaded tissues, to ensure that only a longitudinal expansion is permitted.
Going back towards the precondition of a-reactivity that is needed for neoplastic development in a precise individual, it's permissible to affirm how within the human physique every external or internal element that determines a reduction of well-being in an organism, organ or tissue, possesses oncogenic potentiality. This is not so much because of an intrinsic damaging capability as considerably as for a generic home of favouring the fungal (that is, tumoral) flourishing.
Then the causal network a lot invoked in modern oncology, which will involve toxic, genetic, immunological, psychological, geographical, moral, social, as well as other elements, finds a appropriate classification only inside a mycotic infectious perspective where the arithmetical and diachronic summation of harmful elements functions as a cofactor for the external aggression.
Having theoretically demonstrated the equivalency tumour = fungus, it is actually clear how this interpretative essential offers a long series of questions regarding the contemporary therapies both oncological (made use of with no reference indexes) and antimycotic (utilised only at a superficial level).
Which path is most effective to stroll nowadays, then, when faced having a cancer patient, considering that the traditional oncological remedy, not being etiological, can only sometimes have constructive effects and the majority of the time produces damage?
In the fungal point of view in actual fact, the effectiveness of surgery is noticeably decreased due to the extreme diffusibility and invasiveness characteristic of a mycelial conglomerate. Surgery's to resolve the issue is thus tied towards the situation -- to situations, that is certainly, in which one has the luck to fully take away the entire colony (which is frequently achievable in the presence of a adequate encystment; but right here we are inside the situation of benign tumours).
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy create virtually exclusively unfavorable effects, each for their precise ineffectiveness, and for their high toxicity and harmfulness for the tissues, which inside the last evaluation favours mycotic aggressiveness.
By contrast, an anti-fungal, anti-tumour particular therapy would maintain into account the value with the connective tissue, with each other with all the reproductive complexity of fungi. Only by attacking the fungi across the spectrum of all its types, at points where it is most vulnerable from the nutritional point of view, would it be probable to hope to eradicate them from the human organism.
The very first step to take, thus, will be to reinforce the cancer patient with generic reconstituent measures (nutrition, tonics, regulation of rhythms and vital functions), which are in a position to enhance, by themselves, the common defences in the organism.
Concerning the possibility of obtaining available pharmaceutical cures which regrettably do not exist these days, it seems beneficial, inside the attempt to find an anti-fungal substance that's fairly diffusible and consequently productive, to consider the intense sensitivity of Candida towards sodium bicarbonate (i.e. inside the oral candidosis of breasted babies). This really is constant with all the fact that Candida has an accentuated potential to reproduce in an acid atmosphere.
Theoretically, consequently, if treatment options that put the fungus in direct contact with high bicarbonate concentrations may very well be identified, we must be in a position to see a regression of your tumoral masses.
And this can be what takes place in quite a few sorts of tumour, like colon, liver -- and in particular stomach and lung -- the former susceptible to regression just because of its "external" anatomic position, the latter due to the high diffusibility of sodium bicarbonate within the bronchial program and for its high responsiveness to common reconstituent measures.
By applying a equivalent therapeutic approach, it has been possible in some individuals (about 30 in the final 15 years) to attain complete remission in the symptomatology and normalisation on the instrumental data.
Following would be the reports of seven instances of patients, some of whom survived greater than ten years.
It is very important to emphasise that these instances are presented just as an instance of what could be a brand new method of perceiving the complexity of medical issues, particularly in oncology.
It is clear, actually, that due to the pretty limited number of instances, the lack of documentation displaying rigid, orthodox experimental methodology, and the extended time that has elapsed due to the fact these situations had been treated, that the evidence essential for powerful assistance of this theory on cancer is lacking.
I will not indicate in this paper the private, cultural and expert causes that were accountable for the interruption on the research and remedy of cancer individuals until not too long ago (that is certainly, until two or three years ago, when I resumed the treatment of cancer situations). I am nonetheless convinced that the essential reality that some individuals have already been able to heal and survive for a number of years with therapies which are various from the common, deadly therapeutic techniques, ought to be divulged. This is specially since these results come from a brand new way of pondering which, as opposed to groping in the dark as official and a variety of alternative medicines do, features a well-defined topic -- fungi -- in a theory which not surprisingly continues to be to become proven and validated.
One could ask why more current circumstances aren't shown beneath. This really is mainly because insufficient time has elapsed given that treatment to get a demonstration of long-term nicely becoming from the patients, and consequently these situations are not included.
It is also vital to highlight that these days it is actually pretty complicated to possess a big number of cases, considering that it isn't simple to acquire a big number of cancer patients -- they're addressed by the existing technique almost exclusively toward the official channels of medicine, even when in a lot of circumstances these have been proven ineffective or deadly.
Keeping the above in thoughts, I take into account it useful to describe these cases as follows:
Case 1: A 70-year old female patient with diagnosis of stomach adenocarcinoma confirmed by usually accepted oncological tests (TAK, biopsy, etc.). Two days just before the scheduled operation, she accepts the suggestion of trying a less sanguinary strategy, and leaves the hospital.
For the period of a month, she is administered sodium bicarbonate (a single teaspoon inside a glass of water) to ingest half an hour before breakfast (that is definitely Auto diagnostic tool, on an empty stomach) for the objective of maximising the effect.
After about two months normalisation of the gastric function will take location with attenuation at first, and eventual loss of all of the symptomatology associated to neoplastic pathology (lack of appetite, digestion troubles, fatigue, lipothymic events, and so forth.).
After an endoscopic examination performed a single year soon after the starting of therapy, the total remission of neoplastic formation is ascertained plus the patient refuses additional investigation.
The patient is still alive at this time, 15 years after the remedy.
Case two: A 67-year-old patient with a lengthy history of gastric ulcer is diagnosed with stomach cancer along with a gastrectomy is recommended.
The patient, believing his disease is just an exacerbation of the ulcer, wants to discover an option to surgery. He for that reason accepted a therapy with sodium bicarbonate as in situation 1. The therapy determines inside a few months the regression of the neoplastic symptomatology.
After about 18 months, through which no check-up is performed, upon the return of symptomatology, therapy is resumed as above. Gastric functionality is promptly re-established and maintained for about eight years, soon after which speak to with the patient is lost.
Case three: A 58-year-old patient with stomach carcinoma is diagnosed via histological examination performed on endoscopical sample.
The patient chooses not to undergo the conventional therapies and he decides to accept a therapy related to that inside the two preceding instances. The resulting effect is really a normalisation of symptomatology for about 3 years, that may be, until there are actually no additional medical check-ups.
Case 4: In September, 1983, a 71-year-old patient undergoes a hospital check-up inside a critical condition of emaciation brought on by a sizable weight reduction (about 15 Kgs.) which occurred over the prior handful of months.
Once a stomach neoplastic condition has been diagnosed, and immediately after the layout of a combined oncological therapeutic scheme, the relatives are informed. The relatives are also informed of your issues and risks of such treatment, to become administered to such a debilitated patient.
The wife decides to refuse the standard strategy and decides to bring the husband property and attempt the "harmless" therapy of baking soda, which is administered in a lower dosage than inside the preceding situations. That restores appetite and a satisfactory digestive functionality.
For about eight months the patient has difficulty regaining weight. Soon after this, the improvement is much more and additional evident, together with the just about full regaining of the lost weight (inside 24 months) plus a considerable improvement of your patient's general condition.
Case five: A 51-year-old patient diagnosed at the end of 1983 with bronchial carcinoma within the lower right lobe has the diagnosis confirmed by routine oncological tests (distinctively positive TAK but negative bronchial residue. Surgery is proposed.
The family members decides to delay surgery and attempt the bicarbonate treatment.
Radiological examination is performed 18 months immediately after the treatment. In the course of these months there are no emophtoic episodes as occurred in the beginning from the disease. The radiological examination nonetheless indicates the presence of a nodular mass in the lower component of the appropriate lobe, but its dimensions seem to be smaller plus the contours of your mass far more common.
Case 6: A 48-year-old patient with tumour within the middle lobe on the lung that has been confirmed by all oncological examinations is place on a waiting list for surgery at the beginning of 1983. Incidentally, the execution modality will not look to be completely defined because the neoplastic mass exceeds the limits.
The patient leaves the hospital against the tips of physicians - towards the point that the physicians appear for him for many months. He then submits to a bicarbonate therapy that is in a position to re-establish healthful circumstances.
A radiological examination performed after nine months reveals that the neoplastic mass has been replaced by a tenuous transversal line positioned at the base of the medium lobe which can be interpreted as a residual scar.
The patient is still living.
Case 7: In 1981, a 55-year-old patient is affected by rectal neoplasy which has been evidentiated via symptoms such as complications with evacuation and bleeding, and, instrumentally, by endoscopic examination. Physicians recommend rectal resection and consequent surgical construction of a preternatural anus. Inside the attempt to keep away from this mutilation, the patient submits to a nearby therapy with bicarbonate performed with enemas containing a high bicarbonate answer -- 8 teaspoons per litre.
Three years immediately after the remedy, the patient was still living.
Critical considerations
Having explained the theory and obtaining briefly illustrated the circumstances, it appears suitable to analyse, inside a important and self-critical spirit, what may emerge in neoplastic pathology that is certainly new and concrete.
If we closely observe the proposed therapeutic strategy it can be possible to find out that, independently of its actual effectiveness, it has value as an innovative theory. To begin with, it challenges the present methodology and particularly its assumptions. Second, it provides a concrete option proposal to a mountain of conjectures and postures that sound authoritative but are too generic and as a result ineffective.
The identification of a single tumoral lead to, even with all of the probable general provisos, would represent a step forward that's indispensable for escaping that passivity determined by a lack of final results, and which is responsible for medical behaviours which can be based too much on faith and not sufficient on true self-confidence.
Given, thus, that an unconventional medical method can advantage some individuals improved - from any point of view - than the official therapies, and because useful outcomes is usually demonstrated, this should really stimulate us to pursue further investigation even though avoiding patronising postures which are both limiting and non-productive.
We can for that reason go over whether or not sodium bicarbonate is the real cause for the recoveries or if, instead, those recoveries are due to the interaction of many situations which have been made, the outcomes of unidentified neuro-psychical components, or maybe the benefits of some thing completely unknown. What's beyond question, on the other hand, will be the fact that a certain quantity of folks, by not following traditional strategies, happen to be in a position to go back to normality devoid of suffering and with out mutilation.
The message of this expertise is thus a call to look for these options which might be in accord together with the straightforward Hippocratic premise of man's "well-being"; that's, we will need to be a stimulated to a vital evaluation of our modern oncological therapies which indubitably can guarantee suffering.
One factor is particular: nowadays it truly is no longer reputable (for we are the prey of panic and with the "tumoral syndrome"), to tolerate the slaughtering of patients within the name of a "compassionate" obligation to help and be helped, without the help of solid etiological foundations.
If, for a moment, we take a various point of view and attempt to check out the globe of your tumour with new eyes, that is, by hypothesising a easier genesis of neoplastic proliferation, even the fungal 1, we could be appalled and frightened by the ignorant hand of official medicine - a hand that is armed, on the other hand, with wonderful cynicism and profound superficiality.
One could argue that the failures represent the inevitable price to pay to save people's lives. But when the suffering as well as the "authorised deaths" overwhelm the patient recoveries (that look, indeed, to be random or as a result of components not associated towards the therapies performed), then it's no longer acceptable to operate at all fees and no matter the consequences, for in carrying out so, we are destined only to hurt people today.
One can rebut that the recoveries obtained by utilizing present oncological protocols aren't so couple of, and that in particular sorts of tumour recoveries are a high percentage. It can be straightforward to see, nonetheless, that these results are absolutely nothing but the outcome of propaganda sustained by surreptitious argumentation shedding false light on the topic of tumoral nosological entities.
When we group with each other both malignant tumours which might be occasionally or by no means healed (which include lung and stomach), tumours that border with benignity (including the majority of thyroid and prostatic tumours, and so forth.) or put them with each other with those which have an autonomous good outcome notwithstanding chemotherapy (i.e. infantile leukaemia) - all of this seems to be devious and misleading, having only the goal of forging a consensus that would otherwise be impossible to obtain with intellectually ethical behaviour.
If, for example, out of a certain quantity of tumour species only one particular is susceptible to regression, it's not legitimate to make a nosologic diagram reporting on the global incidence of applied therapeutics irrespective of the total neoplasm's. In fact, it could be far more appropriate to report the uselessness, even the harmfulness of undertaking so, and leave an open field for option hypotheses as far as the demonstration of constructive behaviour by the heteroplasm is concerned.
If, for instance, we go back for any moment to infantile leukaemia, the frequent good outcomes is usually correlated with elements that are extraneous for the therapies administered. For example, they can be correlated with these frequent supportive therapies, that are regarded particularly helpful in young organisms. They are able to be correlated with all the capacity of the connective tissue to obtain, inside a certain stage of development and development, that maturity which can be needed towards the strengthening of an immunological activity which is, at a particular point in life, intrinsically insufficient.
It is actually frequent in medicine that some diseases disappear spontaneously, with out apparent reason, but in correlation with certain transitions of organic maturation.
On the oncological-mycological challenge, it is identified how psoriasis and some chronic and recurrent mycoses of infancy that reject any remedy suddenly, at a certain stage of your body's development, disappear absolutely devoid of a trace.
From the examples noted, which might be uselessly multiplied ad infinitum, it's evident that the full panorama of tumoral illness is very varied and complicated. It follows that, taking postures which might be exclusive or preclusive, whether or not they are conventional or unconventional, may well indicate a lack of vision. This can be in particular so considering the fact that the terrain we're exploring is largely unknown, and hence can not be charted in a way that is certainly uniform or standardised.
Wherever we consider an environment occupied by invisible ultra-microscopic elements, and considering that the structure of know-how must inevitably rest on the construction of a multiplicity of theoretical entities, there's a risk of slipping from a perception that reflects reality to a single that is merely fictional. The acceptance of such a fictional construct might turn out to be a pernicious reality.
The truth that contemporary medicine not just can not provide sufficient interpretative criteria but even utilizes hazardous methodologies that happen to be also damaging and meaningless - even if carried out with great faith - is anything which should push us all to look for humane and logical options. Simultaneously, it can be essential to carefully, open-mindedly, and logically look at any theory or point of view that may be dared to become advanced inside the battle against that monstrous and inhuman yoke that is certainly the tumour.
To this end, a note of acknowledgement is usually to go to all people who are conscious of the harmfulness of standard therapeutic methods and consistently attempt to find alternative options.
People like Di Bella, Govallo and other people, though guilty of utilising the identical inauspicious principles of official medicine (thus showing an excessively conformist mindset) are really applying widespread sense by trying to relieve the suffering of cancer patients by way of the use of painless methodologies and, in some cases, are in a position to attain remissions despite the fact that inside the dark concerning the genuine causes of cancer.
In an alternative point of view, then, it could be needed to conceive a brand new strategy to experimentation in the oncological field, setting epidemiological, etiological, pathogenical, clinical and therapeutical research in line with a renewed microbiology and mycology that would in all probability drive towards the conclusion already illustrated; that is, the tumour is really a fungus - the Candida Albicans.
The probable discovery that not simply tumours but in addition the majority of chronic degenerative disease could possibly be reconciled to mycotic causality would represent a qualitative quantum leap, which, by revolutionising medical pondering, could drastically improve life expectancy and superior of life. Such reconciliation may possibly consist of a wider spectrum of fungal parasites (as an example, in ailments in the connective tissues, various sclerosis, psoriasis, some epileptic forms, diabetes II, and so forth.).
In closing, in the event the planet of fungi - these most complicated and aggressive micro-organisms - has until now too usually been bypassed and left unobserved, the hope of this operate is the fact that we will easily turn out to be conscious of the hazards of these micro-organisms in order that medical resources may be channelled not up blind alleys but toward the real enemies with the human organism: external infectious agents.
Related articles:
